• Contesting decisions, penalties and prescriptive orders of the anti-monopoly authorities in court
• Representation of clients in support of anti-monopoly authority decisions
• Executing amicable settlement agreements with the anti-monopoly authorities
• Representation in court cases related to anti-monopoly authorities challenging deals post-closing
• Representation in appealing judicial rulings under the judicial review procedure

Our reference projects:

• Solvers – Representing the client at a challenge to the FAS approval of a transaction – legality of the FAS approval confirmed
• R-PHARM – Representation on cartel cases in arbitration court – more than 50% of cases won
• GENERALI PPF – Disputed resolutions made by FAS territorial bodies – FAS resolutions overturned
• Russian Standard Insurance – Disputed resolutions made by FAS territorial bodies – FAS territorial bodies’ resolutions overturned
• SevKom (ITA SK, SK Retail, SK Ryba) (The Norwegian Salmon Case) – Disputed resolution made by the FAS on a cartel agreement case in the market for Norwegian salmon – FAS resolution overturned
• DneproVagonMash – Disputed administrative fine – Fine amount reduced to minimum
• Russian Fishing Company (The Norwegian Salmon Case) – Court representation when disputing FAS resolutions imposing administrative fines – positive result
• SevKom (SK Trade) – Private suit against Metro on compensation for losses caused as a result of the retail chain violating the anti-monopoly law – damages successfully claimed from the defendant
• Russian Fishing Company – Private suit against Metro to compensate for losses incurred as a result of the retail chain violating the anti-monopoly law – damages successfully claimed from the defendant
• Russian Fishing Company – Disputed FAS resolution regarding a cartel agreement in the market for pangasius – FAS resolution overturned
• Johnson & Johnson – Participated in a court dispute working with the FAS in a case on unfair competition – the fact of unfair competition fully proven