Practice
Representation in Competition Law Violation Cases Heard by the FAS Russia and its Regional Offices
  • Representation in cartel cases
  • Representation in other anti-monopoly law violation cases
  • Representation in administrative penalty proceedings including turnover based fines
  • Representation in advertising law violation cases
  • Representation in unfair competition cases
  • Filing anti-monopoly law violation complaints with the FAS
  • Pre-trial challenging of imposed administrative fines before superior official

 

Our reference projects:

  • OMK – The “pipe cartel” case – case dropped
  • Skartel – Cases on abuse of dominant position and administrative offences – cases dropped
  • COSCO Russia – Representing the interests of the client (shipper) in a case on a cartel agreement between container lines – case dropped
  • Russian Standard Insurance – Case on an anti-competitive agreement with a bank – case dropped
  • RAO Energy Systems East – Case on an anti-competitive agreement with General Electric – case dropped
  • RosChemZaschita State Corporation – Case on avoidance of signing a government contract – client not included in the register of bad faith suppliers
  • RosChemZaschita State Corporation – Case on cartel agreement between suppliers of self-rescue devices – case dropped for the client
  • UAZ Dealership – Case on coordination of economic activities
  • RosGosStrakh – Signing amicable settlement with Yaroslavl Directorate of the FAS – signed; penalty reduced from 167,539,138.33 RUB to 258,000 RUB.
  • Diacon JSC – Case on an anti-competitive agreement – penalty minimized
  • Translink – Case on an anti-monopoly agreement with the state authorities – case dropped
More examples
Hide
Close
Turn in portrait mode